Extract agreed information, flag uncertainty and approve every record before it moves into your system.
Review my paperwork flowInformation arriving in forms, PDFs or scans often needs reading, retyping into another system and checking.
Our document workflow extracts agreed fields, checks your rules and flags uncertain items. Records reach your destination only after an authorised person approves them.
We create a representative test set with your reviewer and agree field-level measures before work starts. The test includes normal documents, low-quality scans, missing fields, duplicates and unsupported layouts.
We compare extracted values with the reviewer-approved reference records and report errors by field. We also verify that flagged items enter the review queue, rejected documents do not create records and no record bypasses the approval step.
We don't promise perfect extraction or universal accuracy. What matters is whether the workflow meets the agreed checks on representative documents and helps your reviewer work reliably.
Scope, fee, payment schedule, delivery window and support terms are agreed before work starts.
Your written scope defines deliverables, inputs, approval steps, timing, revisions, and completion checks. Any new requirement is separately agreed. Business outcomes such as revenue, rankings, or fixed time savings are not guaranteed.
Tools, usage, source updates, hosting, and monitoring are included only where stated. The proposal identifies ongoing costs and the support window. Additional work needs agreement; monthly capacity is bounded.
The handover documents the agreed access, responsibilities, controls, and known limitations. Ownership and licensing are specified in the written agreement.
No. We agree supported document types, layouts and quality requirements. Unreadable or unfamiliar documents go to a person.
Yes. An authorised reviewer approves every proposed record before it reaches the agreed destination. They can correct or reject it.
Confidence is not proof. The review screen shows the source, and our test report identifies observed errors and limitations.
Only after we agree the lawful purpose, necessary fields, approved processing tools and handling rules with your authorised owner. Sensitive data needs additional review.
No. It can prepare a checked record within scope. Approval of expenditure and movement of money stay in your existing authorised process.
Yes. Each new document family requires representative samples, a field map and its own agreed tests and scope.
Tell us what’s getting in the way. We’ll start there.
Let’s find your first winClear scope. Real examples. No pressure to buy.